I’ve decided to revisit a brick wall ancestor, my 4x-great grandmother, Lydia Minor, and to create, along the way, a complete guide to this journey. I hope readers with their own Rhode Island brick walls will follow along, and perhaps choose one problem to explore on their own as this goes on. The problem originates in Rhode Island but then veers westward; something that many readers will identify with.
I’m not kidding when I say this will probably take years. I chose this problem because it’s pretty hopeless. Eight years has not solved it yet, so there is no low hanging fruit. It should be/would be/could be solvable – the Minors of southeastern Connecticut are pretty well known – but this particular individual has eluded researchers up to now. Lydia Minor is the great-grandmother of my mother’s grandfather, Russell Earl Darling.
The problem, if it is ever solved, will be solved by devising and implementing strategies, which will often involve seeking connections between small details that can be gleaned about Lydia and her known family. So, let’s strategize.

I absolutely need an “X-RAYS BOX.” Right away.
The research question
It’s important to state, in writing, the question. The question needs to narrow down the focus, but also to refer to specific people.
Who were the parents of Lydia Miner, who married Russell Lamphear in 1807 in Preston, Connecticut?
OK. Now I know what I’m looking for.
Lydia Minor’s life
I’d like to begin by showing the little I know about who Lydia Minor really was, so that readers will begin to appreciate her as much as I do.
Direct Evidence
Her marriage:[1]

At Preston, Mr. RUSSELL LAMPHEAR, to Miss Lydia Miner.
Evaluation
- The marriage was recorded in a Norwich, Connecticut newspaper as happening in Preston (Connecticut), the town immediately east of Norwich. When I review facts on the husband, Russell, it will be clear that he was living in Norwich at this time, having recently moved from Westerly, Rhode Island.
- With few Minors in Preston, no clues have surfaced to connect Lydia or Russell to Preston. But embarrassingly, I now realize that although I have consulted The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Records, Preston 1687-1850, Parts 1 & 2, some New London County probate districts via microfilm at the NEHGS library in Boston, and some Preston deeds at the Family History Library in Salt Lake City, I have never been to Preston Town Hall. And there’s nothing like going to the town hall. Well, that’s why we’re doing this! Adding it to the list.
- “Miss” Lydia Miner is an indication this is a first marriage. Based on her age (from her death record, coming up) of about 20 or 21, that was very likely anyway.
Lydia’s newspaper death notice clipping was something I ordered from the New London County Historical Society[3]:

The scanty 23 January 1849 death notice for Lydia at least gives an age, 62.
Evaluation
- The notice, in a Norwich, Connecticut newspaper, specifies that the death occurred at “Norwich Falls.” The Falls is a neighborhood that became industrialized thanks to water power in the very early 1800’s, and (as will be reviewed in the future) evidence points to Russell and Lydia spending many years there.
- Lydia died on 18 January, 1849, still married to her husband Russell. Her age in January, 1849 of 62 years suggests a birth year of 1787 or, even more likely, 1786. Russell certainly knew how old she was, but who the source of this information was, and whether it was reported directly to the paper for insertion or copied from some town record, is unknown. No death record was found on three separate searches in the Norwich Town Hall or in the printed two volume set, Vital records of Norwich, 1659-1848. Also none was found at the Connecticut State Archives in Hartford.
- Western papers please copy is a good indication that Lydia had loved ones west of Connecticut. Although only one son and one daughter are specifically known to have headed west, this is something to keep in mind as the children are explored.
Indirect Evidence
Here are some thoughts about her as shared by her son William in his old age as he was reminiscing to a reporter, along with an old friend (this clipping was sent to me by a very kind researcher on a related line who noticed Russell Lamphere on my blog)[2]:

I think for a woman who married in 1807 and had 14 children, being remembered in this manner by a loving son 50 years after her death is very sweet.
The story, further, tells us that Lydia and Russell Lamphere had 14 children; seven boys and seven girls:

Note that the “genial old gentleman, fond of stories” was Lydia’s son William Lamphere, and the rest of the paragraph refers to Lydia’s husband, Russell Lamphere.
Evaluation:
- Lydia and Russell not only had 14 children, but seven were girls and seven were boys.
- Lydia did all her own housework (I do know that several of the oldest children were girls, which was probably a help) and met “the demands of society” which I take to mean she led a normal life and interacted with her community.
- The Lampheres were Methodists. Good to know.
- The clue about the children living long lives is barely true, as a child-by-child examination will show, but clearly some of them did.
Research plan (just the beginning of the plan, I will keep adding):
- Visit Preston Town Hall to seek birth and marriage records for Lydia, and take a careful look at ALL Minor records in the deeds and probate (although Connecticut separates probates into “districts” I notice the towns often have older materials on hand).
- Review Thomas Minor Descendants 1608-1981 by John Augustus Minor to build a list of all the Lydia Minors that are not the right one. I’ve done this before, but I think I’ll start fresh. Also, in that book, explore Minors who were ever resident in Preston.
- Review historical background materials on Norwich and Preston.
- Investigate Methodists churches in Norwich Falls in the first half of the 1800’s.
- Carefully review available record sets for Norwich and Preston on Ancestry.com, AmericanAncestors.org, and FamilySearch.org, as well as any Revolutionary War records on Fold3 for Minors/Miners from Preston. I haven’t reviewed web resources on this for a while, and it changes quickly.
- Consider a visit to the New London County Historical Society in New London, after the review is well underway and the research plan is more fully developed.

While I don’t have a picture of Lydia of course, this photograph is of her daughter, Lucy Ann (Lamphere) Cook, 1808-1865. From the collection of L. Buck, used with permission.
Next: Starting from the beginning, I’ll review the early life and residences of Lydia’s husband Russell, trying to determine where he met Lydia.
Footnotes
[1] “Married,” The Courier (Norwich, Conn.), 20 May 1807, p. 3, col. 3; image copy, GenealogyBank.com, (http://www.genealogybank.com : accessed 18 June 2011).
[2] “Letters from the People : Old Times and Old Folks,” Norwich (Connecticut) Bulletin, 12 September 1898, p. [unknown], col. 3.
[3] “DIED,” Norwich (Connecticut) Evening Courier, 23 January 1849, vol. VII, no. 141, whole num. 541, p. 3, col. 1.
The post you are reading is located at: http://onerhodeislandfamily.com/2017/03/12/brick-wall-journey-part-1/
Interesting beginning of a research plan.
Note that Lydia was not necessarily mother of all of Russell’s children. And she might have been previously married.
Diane, as usual, I sooo enjoy reading what you are up to. Keep us posted!
I agree with those above that I’m interested in your journey to find her parents. Probate and land records can be very rewarding.
I think you need to include misspellings of their names, because Lydia, Russell and Lamphear were all spelled wrong, and perhaps others. With your detailed research plan, I’m sure you’ll solve this problem. Since I have a lot of brick walls, I’ll be reading along. Rooting for you.
Well I should talk more about that but believe me, it goes with the Lamphere territory … The Curse of the Lampheres I guess! And as you say even the first names can have issues. But I think this problem is more about her being a record-less female, something that I’m sure we can all relate to. So many mysterious aspects of this family. Please follow along Barbara and let me know what you’re thinking.
[…] A Brick Wall Journey Part 1 by Diane Boumenot on One Rhode Island Family […]
In my Lanphere line a have an ancestor named Bathsheba Walworth. I’ve tried and tried to find more out about her and come up with even less than you have to go on. Good luck to you, I can’t wait to see what you learn!
I’ll be following your brick wall story with interest. These are my favorite types of blog posts. I agree with Randy – deeds and probate are probably your best bet, but don’t overlook any odd little records that might give a clue.
Linda, exactly, deeds and probate solve so many problems. What’s interesting about this one is despite the early year, once New Englanders moved to the new mill towns, sometimes their lives NEVER include deeds and probate. Thanks for helping me realize what’s distinctive about this problem; I’ll point this out in the future.
Nice, Diane. I look forward to hearing what you discover!
Well, this should be fun. Good start. I’m looking forward to it. Deed and probate records are your best bet IMHO.
Randy I totally agree, and so far, nothing, so I’d like to visit the deeds and probate in person and see if I do better. As you will see next time, her birthplace is such a mystery. So probate must be perused in location after location. I’m on it! Thanks for leaving a note.
Sounds as if you will be shaking the trees! I have a female ancestor with no maiden name recorded anywhere, and the one possible candidate seems to have married someone else — maybe! Phebe was a common name in the late 1700s. I also have a direct male ancestor from Portsmouth whose parents are not known, although I have constructed a possible family for him, using known individuals from various sources. The plaque at the family cemetery plot gives him the birthdate of another individual of the same name and I discovered it was incorrect. These mysteries can be perplexing and even maddening!
Holy smokes Lois. We have few enough breadcrumbs that we don’t want them to be wrong, BUT, of course they are sometimes. You’re right, though, I’m pretty lucky to know her name, which I guess is what makes this so darn frustrating. Thanks for reading.